JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 13, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Mantilla Guetierrez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia de juez de primera instancia y por excepción de la Corte Constitucional
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de verificación al cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-774/04.

Para fundamentar la intervención de la Corte el memorialista adujo que las actuaciones del juez de instancia no habían sido adecuadas ni suficientes y que ello no sólo era contrario al principio de ejecutoriedad de las sentencia, sino que iba en contra de los derechos colectivos de los colombianos.

La Corte decide no asumir la competencia para verificar el cumplimiento de las órdenes impartidas en la providencia de la referencia y, en consecuencia, NIEGA la petición formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR, conforme a las consideraciones de esta providencia, la solicitud de Carlos Alberto Mantilla Gutierrez de que la Corte Constitucional asuma competencia para verificar el cumplimiento de las ordenes impartidas en la sentencia T -774 de 2004.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, COMUNICAR a las partes del proceso de tutela la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.